IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aho/journl/v15y202oi1p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of non-monetary reward provisions: Evidence from the UK banking sector

Author

Listed:
  • Ese Okpebholo
  • Abdullah Zafar Sheikh

    (Institute of Business Administration, Karachi)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the current state of monetary and non-monetary rewards systems in place in the UK banking sector in an attempt to identify reasons for the preference of monetary rewards over non-monetary rewards. Data was collected from two banks, LLOYDS TSB and Royal Bank of Scotland. The selection of these two banks emanates from their recent bonus crises and the fact that they are both part nationalised, hence the need for a prudent reward system. Questionnaires were used to obtain data and the Evidence Based Reward Management (EBRM) methodology was used to highlight the effectiveness as well as the challenges being faced by the banks with regard to their current monetary reward provisions. Findings reveal that bank employees generally value monetary rewards more than they value non-monetary rewards. Nonetheless, some non-monetary provisions, which virtually do not cost much money, may form the basis for viable alternative reward provisions for bank employees. These findings can help in formulating a more egalitarian reward system in the banking sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ese Okpebholo & Abdullah Zafar Sheikh, 2020. "Optimization of non-monetary reward provisions: Evidence from the UK banking sector," Business Review, School of Economics and Social Sciences, IBA Karachi, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January-J.
  • Handle: RePEc:aho:journl:v:15:y:202o:i:1:p:1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://businessreview.iba.edu.pk/articles/optimization-non-monetary-reward-provisions.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aho:journl:v:15:y:202o:i:1:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sshabbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibakapk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.