IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahc/journl/y2026id2275.html

Managerial rotation: pitfalls of the Peter principle and the myth of the universal manager

Author

Listed:
  • N. A. Bogatov

  • A. S. Savina

  • E. A. Khaladzhan

  • D. S. Lopatkin

  • T. A. Shpilkina

Abstract

The article is devoted to a critical analysis of the practice of rotating senior management personnel in large management facilities. Based on scientific publications on this topic, key mistakes in conducting rotation in organizations («the myth of the universal manager») have been identified. In this study, the authors argue for the need for a multifactorial analysis of the role, the candidate’s management profile, and the team’s characteristics before making a personnel decision. Rotation is not viewed as a routine transfer but rather as a high–risk intervention in the organizational system that is effective only when accompanied by methodical design and measurable success criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • N. A. Bogatov & A. S. Savina & E. A. Khaladzhan & D. S. Lopatkin & T. A. Shpilkina, 2026. "Managerial rotation: pitfalls of the Peter principle and the myth of the universal manager," Entrepreneur’s Guide, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 19(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2026:id:2275
    DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2026-19-3-100-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/viewFile/2275/1833
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-9885-2026-19-3-100-109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2026:id:2275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.