Author
Listed:
- Nurdin, Fadilah
- Raisa, Daeva Mubarika
- Qinayah, Mirnatul
- Ahmad, Ahfandi
- Bulkis, Sitti
- Rahmadanih, Rahmadanih
Abstract
In the position as subjects of development, men and women have the same role in planning, implementing and monitoring development outcomes, however, in practice, there are still many gaps. Gender Pathway Analysis (GAP) is a tool to determine gender gaps indevelopment programs. This study aims to analyze the planning of gender responsive work programs and analyze the relationship between planning and indicators of gender equality and justice. This study uses a qualitative approach with research locations inthe Field of Product Processing, Post Harvest, Information Dissemination and the Horticulture Sector of the Department of Food Security, Food Crops and Horticulture, South Sulawesi Province. The results of the study indicate that in terms of language/policy statements/programs/activities and outputs are still gender neutral, that is, it has not shown any partiality to men and women, but at the time of implementation of the activities, it was seen that both men and women were involved in the activities. There is a gap in the control role, especially activities involving farmer groups. The man/husband is considered to have represented the position of the woman or his wife in various activities. Social factors such as women mostly stay at home being housewivesso that women feel lazy to join organizations. As for economic factors, some women who trade in their homes allow them not to participate in activities, especially involvement in farmer groups.
Suggested Citation
Nurdin, Fadilah & Raisa, Daeva Mubarika & Qinayah, Mirnatul & Ahmad, Ahfandi & Bulkis, Sitti & Rahmadanih, Rahmadanih, 2024.
"Perencanaan Program Kerja Perspektif Gender: Studi Kasus Bidang Pengolahan Hasil, Pasca Panen, Penyebaran Informasi dan Bidang Hortikultura Dinas Ketahanan Pangan, Tanaman Pangan dan Hortikultura Prov,"
Tarjih : Agribusiness Development Journal (TADJ), Muhammadiyah Sinjai University, vol. 1(2), December.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:tadaes:348809
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:tadaes:348809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pmb.umsi.ac.id/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.