Author
Listed:
- Rocha, Joao Henrique
- Estrada, Eduardo Moyano
- Anjos, Flavio Sacco Dos
Abstract
The “Program of Food Access” (PFA) is one of most important policies implemented in Brasil at the framework of “Fome Zero” program. The two goals of this PFA are, on the one hand, to support family farmers’ incomes (state institutions sell food production provided by them) and, on the other hand, to fight against the hanger and malnutrition of people (state insitutions distribute those foods to the poorest population). The success of the PFA depends on the existence of a good governance between the different players participating in the implementation of the Program (family farmers and consumers, and public agencies). In this article, their authors analyse how the PFA is implemented in Boa Vista (a municipality placed in the North-western state of Roraima), and they pay a special attention on the effects of the Program in the land reform settlement called “Nova Amazonia” (composed of family farmers). Based on both the theoretical approach of social capital and the methodological tool of social networks, they analyse the kind of social relationships existing within the “Nova Amazonia” settlement, as well as the institutional network developping between family farmers and state agencies in order to implement the PFA. The data show that the PFA is implemented on the base of a strong institutional network of state agencies, but a weak social network. They debate about the sustainability of social policies such as the PFA in contexts where the level of social cohession is slow and where the logic of implementation of the Program is more top-down than bottom-up.
Suggested Citation
Rocha, Joao Henrique & Estrada, Eduardo Moyano & Anjos, Flavio Sacco Dos, 2015.
"Family farming, institutional markets and social policies in Brazil. An analysis of the implementation of the Program of Food Access in Boa Vista,"
Revista Espanola de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Rural y Marino (formerly Ministry of Agriculture), issue 241.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:spreea:249650
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.249650
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:spreea:249650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.magrama.gob.es/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.