Author
Listed:
- Lupenko, Yurii
- Sholoiko, Antonina
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to investigate prospective ways for financing catastrophic agricultural risks. Research methods. Critical analysis method was used to determine positive and negative sides of financing tools, as well as prospects of different methods of financing catastrophic agricultural risks. Data of Swiss Re Institute and Food and Agriculture Organization on catastrophic losses, including in agriculture were used to substantiate a necessity for finding prospective ways to finance catastrophic agricultural risks. Research results. Such a prospective way for financing catastrophic agricultural risks as crowdfunding has been proposed, which allows to cover some little catastrophic losses in agriculture by expenses of individuals. Charity crowdfunding with a reward is the most appropriate business model of crowdfunding for Ukraine on early stage of its development. In order to prevent the outflow of insurance payments abroad in case of external reinsurance of catastrophic agricultural risks, it is necessary to establish the state reinsurance company. Elements of scientific novelty. Scientific and theoretical principles of using crowdfunding business platforms to expand the capacity of Ukrainian insurance market to finance catastrophic agricultural risks were formed. Such transformations in the institutional and organizational infrastructure of the insurance market in conditions of underdevelopment of the national financial market will reduce the outflow of capital abroad because of reinsurance of these risks in the foreign insurance markets Practical importance. Implementation of the presented suggestions of prospective ways for financing catastrophic agricultural risks will increase a level of coverage of catastrophic losses by internal sources. Tabl.: 1. Figs.: 1. Refs.: 17.
Suggested Citation
Lupenko, Yurii & Sholoiko, Antonina, 2019.
"Prospective ways for financing catastrophic agricultural risks,"
Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, Society of Economists Ekonomika, Nis, Serbia, vol. 26(10).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:sereko:411728
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sereko:411728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekonomika.org.rs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.