IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sereko/411602.html

Rural development in terms of decentralization

Author

Listed:
  • Talavyria, Mykola
  • Horai, Anastasiia

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to theoretically and scientifically justify methodical principles and work out recommendations for rural development in conditions of decentralization. Research methods. During the research process the following scientific methods have been used: system method for specification of categorical apparatus; economic, mathematical and statistical while working with statistical information and outputting analytical expressions; monographic while studying best practices and advanced technologies; logical for determining positive social and economic effects, in order to summarize the results and form the conclusions. Research results. For rural development in Ukraine should be adopted and implemented special regional and local programs for social and economic development of rural areas, primarily aimed at increasing employment and income of rural population, the development of local self-government, and encouragement of non-agricultural business. Unfortunately, in Ukraine, social and economic development and resilience of rural settlements are largely dependent on their territorial proximity to economic and administrative centres (suburban settlements have undeniable advantages). In this regard, definition of possible scenarios of social development of rural settlements with different population level in Ukraine in terms of decentralization of the current management system has become a priority. Elements of scientific novelty. It has been sustained practical, theoretical, and methodological recommendations for concerning sustainable development of rural territories. Practical significance. The research results are an important prerequisite for addressing the issues of sustainable rural development. Tabl.: 1. Refs.: 12.

Suggested Citation

  • Talavyria, Mykola & Horai, Anastasiia, 2018. "Rural development in terms of decentralization," Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, Society of Economists Ekonomika, Nis, Serbia, vol. 25(11).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sereko:411602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/411602/files/eapk_2018_11_p_75_79.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sereko:411602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekonomika.org.rs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.