Author
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to study the process of the origin, formation and evolution of the concept of sustainable development and to consider its essence, as well as to cover various viewpoints on this problem of the Ukrainian scientists and to output a combined single definition. Research methodology. In the research process have been used such scientific methods as: comparison, analysis, synthesis, generalization. Research results. It has been found that in the Ukrainian scientific thinking there are a large number of definitions of the concept of “sustainable development”. Every scientist has his own approach to the interpretation of this concept, speaking about the stability of development, the sustainability of development or the balance of development. They characterize it © V.O. Ivanchenko, 2018 Lopatynskyi Yurii Mykhalovch – doctor of economic sciences, professor, head of the department of enterprise economics and human resource management, Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University (2, Kotsyubynskoho Street, Chernivtsi) E-mail: y.lopatynskyi@chnu.edu.ua Burynska Oksana Ihorivna – assistant of the department of enterprise economics and human resource management, Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University (2, Kotsyubynskoho Street, Chernivtsi) E-mail: oksanasidliar@gmail.com Лопатинский Ю.М., Буринская О.И. Составляющие и приоритеты устойчивого развития аграрного сектора экономики: концептуально-теоретический дискурс Цель статьи – углубить научно-методические положения и разработать практические рекомендации по обеспечению устойчивого развития аграрного сектора национальной экономики. Методика исследования. Методы: экономико-статистический, социологических исследований, экономикоматематического моделирования и сравнительного анализа. Результаты исследования. Систематизированы теоретико-методологические основы концепции устойчивого развития с учетом особенностей ее отраслевой реализации. Предложено расширение пределов и принципов государственночастного партнерства в секторе. Обоснованы приоритетные направления стратегии внедрения концепции устойчивого развития в аграрном секторе, охватывающие совокупность факторов и последовательность этапов практической реализации с целью достижения предложенных стратегических ориентиров. Элементы научной новизны. Усовершенствован методический подход к оценке устойчивости развития аграрного сектора путем расчета интегрального показателя, что даст возможность охарактеризовать концептуальные основы гармонизации составляющих устойчивого развития аграрного сектора национальной экономики посредством разработки императивов построения стратегии инклюзивного развития сектора в теоретическом и практическом контексте. Практическая значимость. Внесены предложения по повышению устойчивости развития аграрного сектора, которые могут быть использованы при разработке программ, мер, направлений общегосударственного, регионального и местного их развития. Табл.: 1. Библиогр.: 19. Ключевые слова: устойчивое развитие, аграрный сектор, составляющие устойчивого развития, приоритеты, гармонизация, государственно-частное партнерство, стратегия. Лопатинский Юрий Михайлович – доктор экономических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой экономики предприятия и управления персоналом, Черновицкий национальный университет имени Юрия Федьковича (г. Черновцы, ул. Коцюбинского, 2) E-mail: y.lopatynskyi@chnu.edu.ua Буринская Оксана Игоревна – ассистент кафедры экономики предприятия и управления персоналом, Черновицкий национальный университет имени Юрия Федьковича (г. Черновцы, ул. Коцюбинского, 2) E-mail: oksanasidliar@gmail.com Стаття надійшла до редакції 20.05.2018 р. Фахове рецензування: 22.05.2018 р. Бібліографічний опис для цитування: Лопатинський Ю. М., Буринська О. І. Складові та пріоритети сталого розвитку аграрного сектору економіки: концептуально-теоретичний дискурс. Економіка АПК. 2018. № 6. С. 94 — 102. * UDС 330.338 V.O. IVANCHENKO, candidate of economic sciences, associate professor (docent), competitor for doctor`s degree The origin and evolution of the concept of “sustainable development” © The purpose of the article is to study the process of the origin, formation and evolution of the concept of sustainable development and to consider its essence, as well as to cover various viewpoints on this problem of the Ukrainian scientists and to output a combined single definition. Research methodology. In the research process have been used such scientific methods as: comparison, analysis, synthesis, generalization. Research results. It has been found that in the Ukrainian scientific thinking there are a large number of definitions of the concept of “sustainable development”. Every scientist has his own approach to the interpretation of this concept, speaking about the stability of development, the sustainability of development or the balance of development. They characterize it © V.O. Ivanchenko, 2018 through a versatile and multifaceted process or the balance of various factors and the interaction of different systems, or the process of movement or the process of change, or through the internal dynamics of the development of society. Investigated process of the emergence of the concept of “sustainable development”, its evolution into the world doctrine of the development of a society that combines economy, ecology and society is explored. It has been substantiated that the most general and appropriate definition is the classical concept of sustainable development which was suggested at the conference in Rio de Janeiro and declared in Ukrainian legislation. Elements of scientific novelty. A variety of approaches to the definition of “sustainable development” has been characterized and a combination of the interpretations has been suggested. Practical significance. Various approaches to the definition and interpretation of the concept of "sustainable development" have been selected and described, and on the basis of the analysis a single definition was suggested. Tabl.: 1. Figs.: 1. Refs.: 30.
Suggested Citation
Ivanchenko, Vitalii, 2018.
"The origin and evolution of the concept of “sustainable development”,"
Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, Society of Economists Ekonomika, Nis, Serbia, vol. 25(6).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:sereko:411547
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.411547
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sereko:411547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekonomika.org.rs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.