IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mercado de carne de frango brasileiro no contexto dos novos acordos regionais de comércio: Transpacífico e Transatlântico

Author

Listed:
  • Medeiros, Angélica Pott de
  • Filho, Reisoli Bender

Abstract

The study aims to examine the possible impacts of the Transpacific and Transatlantic agreements on the Brazilian chicken meat market. The methodology derives from a Spatial Equilibrium Model as a Mixed Complementarity Problem (MCP), based on five alternative scenarios, which aimed to highlight possible changes in the market of chicken meat from the implementation of new trade agreements. The results indicate that, in general, with the implementation of both agreements the Brazilian chicken meat market may invariably cause losses, particularly in relation to production, consequently, affect producers’ prices and surpluses. The most damaging scenarios for Brazil are the formation of the TPP in its broadest form, based on the elimination of tariff and non-tariff barriers, as well as the simultaneous formation of the agreements, in which the country shows a net loss in welfare. From this, we emphasize the importance of negotiating trade agreements to ensure the industry conditions of expansion and access to new markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Medeiros, Angélica Pott de & Filho, Reisoli Bender, 2019. "Mercado de carne de frango brasileiro no contexto dos novos acordos regionais de comércio: Transpacífico e Transatlântico," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 57(4), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341180
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341180/files/Ang%C3%A9lica%20Pott%20de%20Medeiros.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.