IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Anã Lisis De Rentabilidad De Dos Alternativas De Alimentaciã“N No Convencionales En La Producciã“N De Conejos En El Municipio De Tixpehual, Yucatã N, Mã‰Xico

Listed author(s):
  • Peniche Ruz, Jorge Alejandro
  • Rejon Avila, Manuel Jesus
  • Valencia Heredia, Eduardo Rene
  • Pech Martinez, Victor Conrado
Registered author(s):

    Profitability of a rabbit's production unit was evaluated through the analysis of two nonconventional food alternatives (mixing tulip forage, ramon forage and balanced food) compared with the conventional food (balanced food). For analyse the profitability, economic assessment indicators were used: the Net Present Value and the Internal Rate of Return. Based in the obtained results, this study concludes that the more profitable alternative was the ramon forage and balanced food.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Sociedad Mexicana de Administracion Agropecuaria in its journal Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios.

    Volume (Year): 27 (2010)
    Issue (Month): ()

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ags:remeag:93910
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:remeag:93910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.