Author
Listed:
- Oliveira, Michel Angelo Constantino de
- Fonseca, Dany Rafael Mendes
- Reis, Carlos Vinícius dos Santos
- Moreira, Tito Belchior
- Pinheiro, Adalberto Amorim
Abstract
Technological innovations in agribusiness world did not allow the Malthusian theory became a reality. According to studies by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the introduction of more refined techniques of cultivation and soil treatment, as well as the findings of chemical fertilizers and genetically modified crops have led to a remarkable growth of agricultural productivity. This study adopts the CBR as the theoretical basis of empirical development to test the effects of a shock of technological innovation in the economy. In this context, the objective is to measure the effects of the clash of national technological innovation in agriculture through the application of RBC, using as a tool for estimating the program Matlab and Dynare software to create an artificial economy-related variables capital, hours worked, consumption and technology shock. The estimates showed that in all parameters analyzed, the impact of innovation in technology has brought positive impulseresponses in future periods, either in a pet, be it in two. If possible also concluded that innovation is critical to agribusiness and the encouragement of scientific areas related to agriculture, such as biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, contributes greatly to the performance of the sector.
Suggested Citation
Oliveira, Michel Angelo Constantino de & Fonseca, Dany Rafael Mendes & Reis, Carlos Vinícius dos Santos & Moreira, Tito Belchior & Pinheiro, Adalberto Amorim, 2012.
"Impulso-Resposta Do Choque De Inovação Tecnológica À Luz Da Teoria Dos Ciclos Reais De Negócios (Rbc): O Caso Do Setor Agropecuário Brasileiro,"
Revista de Economia e Agronegócio / Brazilian Review of Economics and Agribusiness, Federal University of Vicosa, Department of Agricultural Economics, vol. 10(01), pages 1-28.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:rdeeag:141139
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.141139
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rdeeag:141139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/drufvbr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.