IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/rdecag/154933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dez Anos de Evolução da Agricultura Familiar no Brasil: (1996 e 2006)

Author

Listed:
  • Guanziroli, Carlos Enrique
  • Buainain, Antonio Marcio
  • Sabbato, Alberto Di

Abstract

Este artigo compara os principais resultados do censo agropecuário do IBGE de 1996 com os resultados do censo de 2006, seguindo a metodologia conhecida como “FAO-Incra” que permite caracterizar a agricultura familiar delimitando-a no universo total dos estabelecimentos. Na comparação destacam‑se algumas variáveis significativas, tais como participação no valor da produção total (VBP), participação na área total dos estabelecimentos, utilização de tecnologia moderna e produtividade parcial de fatores.Os censos mostram que a participação na produção agropecuária se manteve praticamente inalterada, passando de 37,91% em 1996 para 36,11% em 2006, numa década de forte expansão do setor, o que revela que este segmente faz parte das cadeias produtivas agropecuárias do agronegócio brasileiro. A agricultura familiar é um segmento heterogêneo, com diversos subsegmentos. Nos dez anos de pesquisa percebe‑se que houve forte crescimento da participação na produção do segmento mais abastado da agricultura familiar (A) e um crescimento numérico dos grupos mais pobres da mesma (C e D), sem o correspondente acréscimo de produção......This article compares the main findings of data fromBrazilian agricultural census in 1996 with the same in 2006 by applying the methodology known as “FAO/Incra”, which allows characterizing family farm in relation to the total universe of farms. In this comparison, several variables are presented, such as the participation of family farming in the total value of production, in the total number of farms, utilization of modern technology and partial factor productivity.Their share of total agricultural production stayed almost equal, with slight reduction, from 37.91% in 1996 to 36,11% during a decade of sharp expansion of agriculture as a whole, demonstrating that this segment is integrated in the productive agricultural chains of the Brazilian agribusiness.Family farming is a heterogeneous segment, with different segments. During the period of ten years, the richestof these segments (A) has increased their participation inthe total production, while the poorest sub segments (C and D) have only grown in absolute terms without a corresponding increase in production.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanziroli, Carlos Enrique & Buainain, Antonio Marcio & Sabbato, Alberto Di, 2012. "Dez Anos de Evolução da Agricultura Familiar no Brasil: (1996 e 2006)," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(3), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:rdecag:154933
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.154933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/154933/files/Artigo%209.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.154933?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Castro & Nilcileny Da Silva Batista & Agnieszka E. Latawiec & Aline Rodrigues & Bernardo Strassburg & Daniel Silva & Ednaldo Araujo & Luiz Fernando D. De Moraes & Jose Guilherme Guerra & Gabriel G, 2018. "The Effects of Gliricidia -Derived Biochar on Sequential Maize and Bean Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Fernando Gaiger Silveira & Pedro Arruda & Izabelle Vieira & Simone Battestin & Áquila Estevão Campos & Wesley Silva, 2016. "Public policies for rural development and combating poverty in rural areas," Working Papers 142, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    3. Ghinoi, Stefano & Wesz Junior, Valdemar João & Piras, Simone, 2018. "Political debates and agricultural policies: Discourse coalitions behind the creation of Brazil’s Pronaf," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 68-80.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rdecag:154933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.