IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polpwa/257529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Struktury rolne i produktywność rolnictwa w Grupie Wyszehradzkiej

Author

Listed:
  • Piwowar, Arkadiusz

Abstract

The main objective of the study was a comparative analysis of the diversity of the agrarian structure and the productivity of land and labour in the Visegrad Group countries. Additionally, the importance of the Visegrad Group in the European Union was analysed in relation to the size of the production of selected crops and livestock as well as the population and cast of cattle and pigs. According to the conducted analyses, the highest productivity of land among the countries of the Visegrad Group was shown in the years under study by Poland and Hungary (over EUR 600 / ha AL), while the highest dynamics of the growth rate of this parameter - by Slovakia (almost two-fold increase in 2010-2013). Taking into account labour productivity, it should be emphasized, that the greatest labour productivity characterized farms in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Synopsis. Głównym celem pracy było porównanie zróżnicowania struktury agrarnej oraz produktywności ziemi i pracy w krajach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej. Dodatkowo analizie poddano znaczenie Grupy Wyszehradzkiej w Unii Europejskiej w odniesieniu do wielkości produkcji wybranych ziemiopłodów oraz pogłowia i obsady bydła a także trzody chlewnej. Jak wynika z przeprowadzonych analiz, najwyższą spośród państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej produktywnością ziemi odznaczały się w badanych latach Polska i Węgry (ponad 600 euro/ha UR), z kolei największą dynamiką wzrostu tej wielkości – Słowacja (niemal dwukrotny wzrost w latach 2010-2013). Biorąc pod uwagę produktywność pracy należy podkreślić, że największą wydajnością pracy charakteryzowały się gospodarstwa rolne w Czechach i na Słowacji.

Suggested Citation

  • Piwowar, Arkadiusz, 2017. "Struktury rolne i produktywność rolnictwa w Grupie Wyszehradzkiej," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 17(32, Part ), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:257529
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.257529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/257529/files/2017_1_14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.257529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:257529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wesggpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.