- Aspile, Sharmaine Chantal Khaye C.
- Manipol, Nohreen Ethel P.
- Despositorio, Dinah Pura T.
- Aquino, Namete A.
This paper compares the profitability of swine enterprises according to scale of operation and production system in two major hog-producing towns in Bulacan, Philippines. Results are based on a survey of 145 hog raisers — 71 from the City of San Jose del Monte (CSJDM) and 74 from Santa Maria. The CSJDM enterprises have higher net income per head than the Santa Maria enterprises but the latter have slightly higher profit-to-sales ratio. By scale of operation, medium commercial enterprises are the most profitable in both areas and found to have sold their produce at the highest price. Across production systems, the farrow-to-breeder-finisher in CSJDM registers the highest proportion of profit to sales. This system sells multiple products and its breeder stocks are sold at higher prices. The boar-for-hire production system has the lowest profit-to-sales ratio, which is attributed to the increasing utilization of artificial insemination in CSJDM. In the case of the Santa Maria enterprises, the farrow-to-finish production system registers the highest income on a per head basis; the lowest for the growing-finishing production system. By scale of operation, the internal factors which determine profitability are the number of hogs raised and the utilization of high-quality feeds. By production system, the critical internal factors are the types and prices of animals sold, feeds, and capital for weaners. A favorable enabling environment, including improved incentive system and accessible credit, can help promote commercial and integrated swine enterprises in the study area.
Aspile, Sharmaine Chantal Khaye C. & Manipol, Nohreen Ethel P. & Despositorio, Dinah Pura T. & Aquino, Namete A., 2016.
"Profitability of Swine Enterprises by Scale of Operation and Production System in Two Hog-Producing Towns in Bulacan, Philippines,"
Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development, Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development (JEMAD), vol. 2(2), December.
Download full text from publisher
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pjemad:309284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceuplph.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceuplph.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.