IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/orarao/262762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulações De Razões Ótimas De Hedge Para A Uva Exportada Brasileira

Author

Listed:
  • Oliveira, Abdinardo Moreira Barreto
  • dos Santos, Joséte Florencio

Abstract

Num estudo exploratório anterior, Ferreira e Sampaio (2009) encontraram uma predisposição dos fruticultores para a implantação de um mercado de futuros para a uva e a manga exportada brasileira. Entretanto, uma das limitações desse estudo foi a ausência das razões de hedge que melhor atendessem às demandas daqueles fruticultores envolvidos. Objetivou-se neste artigo identificar, por simulação, as razões ótimas de hedge que seriam efetivas na diminuição do risco de preço da uva exportada brasileira, via mercado de futuros. Coletaram-se 300 preços médios mensais US$ FOB/kg entre 1989 e 2013 no site AliceWeb2. Utilizou-se o modelo de previsão ARIMA para simular os preços futuros. Construíram-se 48 cenários para cada abordagem de hedging empregada no estudo: Variância Mínima e Média-Variância. Identificou-se que os contratos futuros, com vencimento de 03 e 06 meses apresentaram, as melhores médias na efetividade do hedge (26% e 20%, respectivamente), com razões ótimas de hedge de 91,6% e 66,4%, em posições vendidas. Estes resultados, portanto, coincidem com o prazo de armazenagem de 01 a 06 meses em packing houses, mostrando assim o aparecimento de uma ligação entre aspectos operacionais e financeiros que viabilizariam o contrato futuro da uva exportada brasileira. ----- In an early exploratory study, Ferreira and Sampaio (2009) found a predisposition of fruit-growers for the implementation of a future market for the Brazilian exported grape and mango. However, one of limitations they faced was the absence of hedge ratios which could better meet their demands. By using simulation, we performed this work aiming to identify optimal hedge ratios which would be effective in reducing the price risk of Brazilian exported grape via future market. By searching on the AliceWeb2 website, we obtained 300 monthly means of FOB price per kilogram, estimated in US dollar, from 1989 to 2013. An ARIMA forecasting model was used to simulate future prices. Forty-eight scenarios were established for each hedging approach, namely, Minimum Variance and Mean-Variance. Future contracts expiring in three and six months were found to show better means of hedge effectiveness, about 26% and 20%, respectively, with optimal hedge ratio of about 91.6% and 66.4% in short position. These results were according to the storage term from one to six months in packing houses, showing the appearance of a link between operational and financial aspects, which serve the future contract of Brazilian exported grape.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliveira, Abdinardo Moreira Barreto & dos Santos, Joséte Florencio, 2015. "Simulações De Razões Ótimas De Hedge Para A Uva Exportada Brasileira," Organizações Rurais e Agroindustriais/Rural and Agro-Industrial Organizations, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Administracao e Economia, vol. 17(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:orarao:262762
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262762/files/952-2276-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262762/files/952-2276-1-PB.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:orarao:262762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deflabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.