IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndsutm/373344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China Could Bypass U.S. Soybeans in 2025/26 and IEEPA Tariffs Raise Input Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Arita, Shawn
  • Kim, Jiyeon
  • Lwin, Wuit Yi
  • Steinbach, Sandro
  • Wang, Ming
  • Zhuang, Xiting

Abstract

The October 2025 NDSU Agricultural Trade Monitor finds that China could bypass U.S. soybeans during the 2025/26 marketing year if it accepts higher costs and modest ration adjustments. Based on trade-war analogs and updated projections, Brazil and other suppliers could provide about 107 million metric tons of soybeans, covering 96% of China’s 112 million metric ton import demand, while China’s domestic stocks of roughly 27 million metric tons could close the remaining gap. Current Brazilian premiums average around $40 per ton above U.S. offers, compared with more than $90 during the 2018–2019 trade conflict, indicating that substitution remains economically feasible. The report also finds that IEEPA tariffs imposed in April 2025 are reshaping U.S. agricultural input imports and raising fertilizer costs. Nitrogen imports from tariffed countries declined 23%, or 580,000 tons, and phosphate imports fell 47%, while imports from exempt or USMCA suppliers increased 44%. By late summer, U.S. farmers were paying about $34 per ton more for DAP, $32 more for MAP, and $11 more for urea than Canadian producers. Together, these shifts show how weakened Chinese demand and higher input costs are reshaping U.S. agricultural trade flows, farm margins, and competitiveness in 2025/26.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ndsutm:373344
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.373344
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/373344/files/NDSU%20Agricultural%20Trade%20Monitor%202025-10.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.373344?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndsutm:373344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/candsus.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.