IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndjtrf/207191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Design Standards of Four‐Hour‐Volume Traffic Signal Warrant

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Xuesong
  • Gan, Albert
  • Shen, David

Abstract

Traffic signal warrants set the minimum conditions under which a traffic signal installation may be appropriate. The four-hour volume signal warrant in the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (FHWA 2009) is applied based on a set of critical vehicular volumes for different lane combinations of major and minor streets. This paper describes an effort to apply microscopic simulation to evaluate the critical volumes used in the four-hour warrant. The results show significant differences in average control delay for minor street traffic under different volume combinations, lane configurations, turning volume percentages, heavy vehicle percentages, and the number of major street lanes (four versus six lanes), most of which are not currently considered in the four-hour warrant. This finding provides some evidence of the need to possibly revise the critical design values of the current four-hour volume warrant.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Xuesong & Gan, Albert & Shen, David, 2010. "Evaluation of Design Standards of Four‐Hour‐Volume Traffic Signal Warrant," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 49(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:207191
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207191/files/2561-5301-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:207191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.