IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/naaenj/404183.html

Prevalence Of Insecurity On Rural Farming Households’ Food Security In Chikun And Kajuru Local Government Areas Of Kaduna State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • James, E. Y
  • Oshundele E. D.
  • Faruk, A. U

Abstract

This research analyzed insecurity and its effect on rural farming households’ food security in Chikun and Kajuru Local Government Areas of Kaduna State, Nigeria. The study purposively selected Chikun and Kajuru LGA due to the predominance of insecurity in the area, and then employed a multi-stage sampling method in selecting three wards in each village. Data collection involved administering questionnaires to 369 rural farming households primarily involved in crop production. Analytical tools such as descriptive statistics, Tobit regression analysis, and coping strategies use index (CSUI) were utilized. The findings indicated that 42.3% of the respondents had primary education with the mean household size of 8 individuals. About 69.9% of the surveyed individuals pursued farming as their primary occupation and 96.2% were affiliated with a cooperative society. Many farming households. (54.5%) were able to access credit amounts of less than ₦50,001 (60.2%). Approximately 68.3% of the farming households did not receive any aid from their children or relatives outside the community while household heads fall sick occasionally (63.1%), their family members had also experienced occasional illnesses (50.7%). Cereals (55.8%) were consumed the most among the farming households. About 39.8% had encountered various forms of insecurity in the study area for about 4 to 6 years of which banditry accounted for approximately 60.2% and According to the farming households, governmental neglect (96.5%) has left the rural regions vulnerable to security threats. Insecurity had the most substantial effect on their farming activities in terms of labour availability, with a weighted average of 3.19. Social (3.55), psychological (3.49), material (3.44) and financial (3.36) losses were experienced by the rural farming households. The coping strategies during insecurity included purchasing food from the market (3.46), eating less preferred food (3.26), relocating/migrating to urban areas or safer regions (3.12) and borrowing money or food from friends or relatives (3.10). Factors such as age, total crop income and level of education significantly influenced the choice of coping strategy at a 1% significance level, while belonging to a farmer's group or association lodged it at a 5% level and household size at a 10% level of significance.

Suggested Citation

  • James, E. Y & Oshundele E. D. & Faruk, A. U, 2025. "Prevalence Of Insecurity On Rural Farming Households’ Food Security In Chikun And Kajuru Local Government Areas Of Kaduna State, Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 15(1), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:naaenj:404183
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404183/files/9-James%20et%20al..pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:naaenj:404183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/naaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.