IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jordng/290491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Evaluation for Food Safety Regulation : Theoretical Approaches and Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Kyeiim

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to showcase the process of risk assessment and to present a Risk/Benefit Model for the economic evaluation of food safety regulation. In this study, we classified hazardous materials in food, and introduced the process of risk assessment and the current status of risk assessment in Korea. As the main approaches to measure the social benefit, WTP (Willingness-to-Pay) and COI (Cost-of-Illness) approaches are discussed. Then, we developed a Risk/Benefit Model to evaluate the economic validity of food safety management in Korea: Introducing HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) in the catering industry to eliminate the risk of food-born diseases. The results of this analysis show that the introduction of HACCP in the catering industry in Korea is economically accepted, and thus this food safety regulation should be performed. The discussion in this paper offers not only a methodology to measure the economic validity of government regulations or programs for food safety, but also an idea for further studies. The Risk/Benefit Model developed in the paper, in particular, might be the starting point for future research measuring economic validity of policies on the food safety management system in Korea.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Kyeiim, 2007. "Economic Evaluation for Food Safety Regulation : Theoretical Approaches and Case Study," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 30(4), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:290491
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290491/files/2007-30-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:290491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kreinkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.