IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative Change and the Myth of Rationality


  • Rokholt, Per Ove
  • Borgen, Svein Ole


Much of the current research on agricultural cooperatives is biased towards weaknesses of the cooperative organization form. The literature says very little about the strengths and advantages of the cooperative form and what is necessary to develop the form's uniqueness into a sustainable competitive advantage. We argue that for cooperatives to remain viable and competitive, the advantages of the form must be clearly manifested. There is now a lack of systematic theorizing in this field. Typically, the weaknesses of the cooperative form are compared to the strengths of the investor-owned firms. Our point is that the cooperative form is based on a logic which is different from that captured by the image of rationality, seemingly prevalent in many current studies of cooperatives. There is a call for a more coherent theory of the competitiveness of the cooperative form. So far, the contributions based on agency theory and transaction cost economics (TeE) are essentially met by an optimistic but incomplete cooperative ideology.

Suggested Citation

  • Rokholt, Per Ove & Borgen, Svein Ole, 2000. "Cooperative Change and the Myth of Rationality," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 28(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:62039

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Nowak, Piotr & GORLACH, KRZYSZTOF, 0. "Rolnicy I Spółdzielczość W Polsce: Stary Czy Nowy Ruch Społeczny?," Village and Agriculture (WieÅ› i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, issue 1.1.

    More about this item




    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:62039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.