IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jamdev/407699.html

Income Risk and Risk Management of Rice Farming Under Landscape Integrated Pest Management Program in Klaten Regency

Author

Listed:
  • Meliala, Eka Safaina
  • Hardyastuti, Suhatmini
  • Mulyo, Jangkung Handoyo

Abstract

Landscape IPM is an extended version of IPM that implemented by the design of a wider expanse of land fields and a greater number of farmers involved. This study was aimed to determine (1) the comparative of income risk of the IPM and non-landscape IPM rice farmers and (2) factors that affect the income and income risk of the IPM and non-landscape IPM rice farm. The research location and respondents are selected by purposive sampling for 30 landscape IPM farmers and by simple random sampling for 30 Non-landscape IPM farmers chosen from four farmers groups in Klaten Regency. To determine the income risk of the IPM and non-landscape IPM rice farm, the coefficient of variation (CV) is used. To determine the factors that affect the income and risk income of the IPM and non-landscape IPM, multiple regression analysis is employed. The results showed that landscape IPM rice farm has a higher risk of income than the on-landscape IPM rice farm. The factors that positively affect income of the landscape IPM rice farm are farm size and refugia flower while it is negatively affected by seed prices. The factors that positively affect the Non-landscape IPM rice farm income is farm size, and it is negatively affected by seed prices and liquid pesticide prices. The factors that positively affect income risk of the landscape IPM rice farm is farm size and negatively affected by refugia flower. The factors that positively affect non-landscape IPM rice farm income risk are liquid pesticide prices and solid pesticide prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Meliala, Eka Safaina & Hardyastuti, Suhatmini & Mulyo, Jangkung Handoyo, 2021. "Income Risk and Risk Management of Rice Farming Under Landscape Integrated Pest Management Program in Klaten Regency," Journal of Agribusiness Management and Development (JAMADev), Universitas Gadjah Mada, Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, vol. 2(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jamdev:407699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/407699/files/2226-Article%20Text-9436-4-10-20231205.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jamdev:407699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://en.faperta.ugm.ac.id/department-of-social-agricultural-economics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.