IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipeceg/386287.html

Reggio Emilia Pedagogy in Brazil and the Political Pedagogical Project

Author

Listed:
  • Silva, Tatiane
  • Pacagnella, Luiz Eduardo

Abstract

Considering the complexity and uniqueness of the concepts implied by a given pedagogical approach, its importance and relevance to understanding the teaching process, and its potential contributions to educational discussion, this study aimed to analyze and identify the main perceptions of teachers and administrators regarding the implementation of the Reggio Emilia pedagogical approach in the Political-Pedagogical Project of a private Brazilian educational institution. The methodology employed involved a literature review, along with the application of questionnaires to teachers (pedagogues); specialist teachers (Arts, Physical Education, Body Expression, Music); pedagogical administrators (coordinators); and administrative administrators. In addition, direct observations of the school environment were conducted at the research site. Based on the responses obtained, it was found that although the Reggio Emilia approach, in its original assumptions, advocated for an education based on a collective spirit of collaboration between the school community, families, and students, the analysis of the Brazilian case revealed that decisions and actions for the implementation of the Reggio Emilia approach did not occur collectively, but rather in a centralized manner, centered on pedagogical and administrative managers, without the participation of the school community. This fact stands out as one of the main causes of the difficulty in effectively implementing the Reggio Emilia approach in the institution studied and in establishing a Political-Pedagogical Project with a differentiated educational approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Silva, Tatiane & Pacagnella, Luiz Eduardo, 2018. "Reggio Emilia Pedagogy in Brazil and the Political Pedagogical Project," Revista IPecege, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 4(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/386287/files/admin%2C%2B4.%2B263.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.