Author
Listed:
- Nunes, Tulio Ibanez
- Fausto, Daiane Aparecida
Abstract
The sustainability diagnosis of a property must follow a set of well-defined and standardized methods to ensure a complete and valid assessment. The objective of this work was to conduct a diagnosis using the Weighted Environmental Impact Assessment of Activities of the New Rural [APOIA-NovoRural] program, a tool developed by Embrapa. In addition to a detailed diagnosis of the sustainability dimensions, improvements were proposed for the weaknesses identified by the method. The identification of weaknesses is directly associated with low scores in the APOIA-NovoRural method. A detailed analysis of the causes of low scores was carried out, and possible improvements were subsequently identified. Integrated production systems such as crop-livestock integration, crop-livestock-forestry integration, and silvopastoral systems were analyzed and served as a basis for proposing improvements in sustainability in the environmental and economic dimensions. In the social dimension, a study on improving the health conditions of employees was presented. A Plan, Do, Check, Act [PDCA] improvement plan was developed for the implementation of a silvopastoral system, and another for the occupational health area. In the sustainability analysis carried out by the APOIA-NovoRural program, it was possible to identify weaknesses and, with the implementation of PDCA cycles, create a system for continuous improvement.
Suggested Citation
Nunes, Tulio Ibanez & Fausto, Daiane Aparecida, 2017.
"Sustainability indicators generate improvement plans for rural properties,"
Revista IPecege, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 3(4).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386277
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.