Author
Listed:
- Gomes, Júnio
- Bajay, Miklos Maximiliano
Abstract
Currently, sugarcane field renovation is a fundamentally technical decision, based on the experience of technicians, especially in the use of important indicators that support this decision-making process, for the purpose of obtaining profit. Therefore, the use of analytical tools that can assist in project management is essential. This work aimed to apply the use of economic project analysis indicators, evaluating the financial returns of a sugarcane field cycle at different cutting stages, in order to determine the cutting stage that offers the most suitable economic point for its renovation and the possibility of indicating its use as a quick, safe, and practical option in the sugarcane field renovation decision. Some data, production indicators, defined as basic premises, served for the calculations of the Net Present Value with different dates [NPV] and the Annual Net Present Value [ANPV] for a sugarcane field in the traditional Central-South region of Brazil. The ANPV was used because it is a method that compares projects with different periods, which made it relevant to solving the problem proposed in this work. After analysis, without varying the indicators, it was found that sugarcane field renovation can be done in the seventh harvest. When the variation of different production indicators and scenarios was studied, in a sensitivity analysis, there was an alternation in the ideal economic point for renovation, indicating, therefore, a change in the ideal harvest stage for renovation. This indicates that the tool is practical, flexible, and can assist and be recommended in the decision-making process for sugarcane field renovation by producers and managers in the sector.
Suggested Citation
Gomes, Júnio & Bajay, Miklos Maximiliano, 2017.
"Economic viability of the retirement age for sugarcane plantations,"
Revista IPecege, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 3(3).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386265
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.