IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipeceg/386251.html

Economic potential of using micro-terracing in coffee plantations: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Alves, Ednaldo Lino
  • Pereira, Fernanda Aparecida Castro
  • Dalchiavon, Flavio Carlos

Abstract

Among the main problems currently faced by mountain coffee farming is the high cost of production, decisively influenced by the scarcity and high cost of labor. This work aimed to carry out an economic feasibility analysis of the use of micro-terracing in coffee plantations in the interior of São Paulo state. The study compared the production costs in two systems: semi-mechanized (micro-terracing) and manual, over a period of 10 years. The data were collected on a rural property in the municipality of São Sebastião da Grama, São Paulo, in an area of ​​12 ha, already established and in production. For revenues, the value of a 60 kg bag of processed Arabica coffee was considered at R$ 410.00. The financial indicators used were: Net Present Value [NPV], Internal Rate of Return [IRR] and discounted payback. Micro-terracing presents itself as an economically viable alternative; The project's cash flow demonstrates positive NPV values ​​using minimum attractive rates of return ranging from 6% to 20%; an IRR of 41% and a discounted payback period of two years. The largest contribution to reducing the production cost of the terraced land comes from the labor budget item, both in cultivation practices and harvesting. The cash flow considering the micro-terraced area is positive and higher than that of the compared area.

Suggested Citation

  • Alves, Ednaldo Lino & Pereira, Fernanda Aparecida Castro & Dalchiavon, Flavio Carlos, 2017. "Economic potential of using micro-terracing in coffee plantations: a case study," Revista IPecege, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 3(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/386251/files/admin%2C%2B3%2B-Alves%2Bet%2Bal..pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.