IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipeceg/386247.html

Economic biomass from tilapia production in net cages on a rural property in southeastern Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Sonoda, Daniel Yokoyama
  • Cyrino, José Eurico Possebon
  • Shirota, Ricardo

Abstract

Technological advancements in fish farming have allowed for increased productivity and a consequent increase in fish production. However, increased system productivity does not always result in better profitability. Economic biomass calculates the point of maximum profit based on a relevant variable. Two distinct methods are proposed: an indirect one, where biomass and inputs are a function of time; and a direct one, where biomass is a function of the system's main input: the feed used. The economic biomass in the two methods showed different figures: 173.66 kg m⁻³ for the indirect method and 153.38 kg m⁻³ for the direct method. In the indirect method, more inputs vary over time than just the feed considered by the direct method; therefore, each method can be used depending on the situation in which economic biomass is to be evaluated. In cases where more information is available about the use of inputs and biomass, the indirect method may be more suitable. On the other hand, when only feed use data as a function of biomass is available, the direct method would be the most recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonoda, Daniel Yokoyama & Cyrino, José Eurico Possebon & Shirota, Ricardo, 2016. "Economic biomass from tilapia production in net cages on a rural property in southeastern Brazil," Revista IPecege, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 2(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/386247/files/admin%2C%2B4%2B-%2BSonoda%2Bet%2Bal..pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.