Author
Listed:
- Kunitake, Adriana
- Mota, Edson Pereira da
Abstract
Farmers are seeking greater profitability in their businesses; therefore, managerial analysis of production costs is a fundamental factor for their success. The acquisition of agricultural inputs has a significant impact on the production cost of soybean cultivation. It is necessary for farmers to verify the best payment terms according to their financial situation, thus guaranteeing profitability. To assist in this decision-making process, the objective was to compare four payment methods for agricultural inputs for soybean cultivation in the state of Mato Grosso during the 2014/2015 harvest. The payment methods were: barter transactions, bank financing (free and mandatory resources), and cash payment. Data were collected from averages in the state of Mato Grosso, and consultations were conducted with state retailers for a better understanding and information on barter transactions. Three different scenarios regarding the price of a sack of soybeans at harvest time were analyzed: scenario 1 – R$ 40.00 sc -1 , scenario 2 – R$ 50.00 sc -1 , and scenario 3 – R$ 60.00 sc -1 . In all three scenarios, the barter operation proved economically viable, especially in the first two, showing profitability of R$ 144.99 ha -1 and R$ 383.99 ha- 1 , respectively . It is concluded that the barter operation, which has been gaining prominence in the market, was the most attractive form of payment for soybean prices up to R$ 50.00 sc -1 . In situations of high prices (R$ 60.00 sc -1 ), cash payment with mandatory resources were the best options for the producer.
Suggested Citation
Kunitake, Adriana & Mota, Edson Pereira da, 2016.
"Comparative analysis of input costs for soybean production in the State of Mato Grosso,"
Revista IPecege, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 2(4).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386245
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipeceg:386245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.