IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipbjia/371692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pendapatan Usahatani Ubi Kayu Berdasarkan Saluran Pemasaran Di Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Hidayah, Risa Nur
  • Adhi, Andriyono Kilat
  • Etriya, Etriya

Abstract

Cassava farms in Gunungkidul Yogyakarta face two marketing channel choices: through food processors (marketing channel 1) and intermediaries (marketing channel 2). Each channel requires different cassava quality and offers different prices. This paper compared cassava farm incomes through marketing channels 1 and 2 using the R/C ratio and independent sample t-test. A survey was conducted to interview 26 cassava farms through marketing channel 1 and 45 cassava farms through marketing channel 2. The results demonstrate that cassava farm incomes through marketing channel 1 are greater than farm incomes through marketing channel 2. Fertilizer costs significantly contribute to a total farm cost. This paper suggests that farmers improve their cassava quality and facilitate them to engage with food processors that offer high prices. Farmers must be encouraged to use fertilizers at the right dosage to reduce farm costs.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371692
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/371692/files/53224-Article%20Text-285546-1-10-20240628.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbipbid.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.