IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipbjia/371690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sikap Dan Preferensi Konsumen Terhadap Kopi Arabika Gayo

Author

Listed:
  • A'la, Nurul
  • Nurmalina, Rita
  • Suprehatin, Suprehatin

Abstract

The research aims to identify purchasing decisions, as well as to analyze consumer attitudes and preferences towards Gayo Arabica Coffee. This research uses primary data from an online survey using google forms involving 223 respondents who participated. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, fishbein multi-attribute analysis, and conjoint analysis. The research results show that the consumer decision making process goes through five decision stages. The comparison between three variants of arabica coffee, namely Gayo Arabica Coffee, Sidikalang Coffee, and Mandheling (lintong) Coffee show that consumer attitudes towards Gayo Arabica Coffee are more positive by 170.16 points. Gayo Arabica Coffee has advantages in the attributes of taste, aroma, product availability, aftertaste, and product information. This is supported by the results of consumer preferences on the level of attribute importance; the taste attribute has the highest level of attribute importance in Gayo Arabica Coffee products at 30.79 percent. Consumers also prefer Gayo Arabica Coffee, which has a sweet taste, a lingering aftertaste, strong aroma, light viscosity and a price of Rp 35,000/250g. Therefore, producers need to make improvements to product attributes that do not meet consumer expectations, as well as improve and maintain product attributes that meet consumer expectations.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371690
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/371690/files/53223-Article%20Text-285400-1-10-20240627.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbipbid.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.