IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipbjia/371664.html

Komparasi Pendapatan Varietas Unggul Padi Di Lahan Demonstration-Farm (Demfarm)

Author

Listed:
  • Nearti, Yuwinti
  • Fachrudin, Budi
  • Zuliansyah, Muhammad Andri

Abstract

One of the technological components that plays a significant role in increasing rice productivity and efficiency is superior varieties. This study aimed to determine the production and income of rice by testing superior varieties namely IPB 3S, Inpari 32 and Ciherang on demfarm land. The method used in this research was a qualitative and quantitative method that was experimental with the selection of locations by case study. The data analyzed included production costs, revenues, income and return cost ratio (R/C) as well as the one-way ANOVA test to see whether there was an effect of seeds on income. The results showed that the income for the three superior varieties consisting of Rp. -14,794,470/ha/MT for IPB 3S, Rp. -13,276,970/ha/MT for Inpari 32, and Rp. -11,898,470/ha/MT for Ciherang, 4) Return Cost Ratio (R/C) includes IPB 3S of 0,20, Inpari 32 of 0,21 and Ciherang of 0,26. The R/C value < 1 means that it is inefficient due to acidic soil conditions, poor drainage, high rainfall and pest and plant disease disturbances. The results of the one-way ANOVA test analysis showed that seed varieties have no significant effect on income.

Suggested Citation

  • Nearti, Yuwinti & Fachrudin, Budi & Zuliansyah, Muhammad Andri, 2023. "Komparasi Pendapatan Varietas Unggul Padi Di Lahan Demonstration-Farm (Demfarm)," Journal of Indonesian Agribusiness, IPB University, vol. 11(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/371664/files/38546-Article%20Text-224684-3-10-20230626.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbipbid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.