IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipbjia/371639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analisis Kelayakan Usaha Udang Vaname (Litopenaeus Vannamei) Keramba Jaring Apung Laut Di Kepulauan Seribu

Author

Listed:
  • Darmawan Esa, M. Fariz
  • Krisnamurthi, Bayu
  • Suharno, Suharno

Abstract

The high demand for vannamei shrimp encourages the government to increase production so that it can compete in the world market, but there is limited capacity in the ponds so that floating net cages of vaname shrimp are cultivated. This new approach requires a feasibility assessment, both economically and socioecologically, therefore the aims of this study was to assess it. The research location was determined purposively in the Thousand Islands. Primary data was collected by survey method with interview techniques assisted by structured questions. Secondary data collection is carried out to agencies such as the Center for Coastal and Ocean Resources Studies. The analyzes used are financial analysis and Rapid Appraisal of Fisheries (RAPFISH) analysis. The results show that in the financial aspect, the criteria for B / C ratio are still B / C <1, so it was not feasible. In the ecological and social aspects, based on the RAPFISH analysis, it has a fairly sustainable category so that there is a need for an increase in sensitive attributes. When compared with other business alternatives, it can be seen that the opportunity cost lost when choosing a vannamei shrimp business is Rp84.740.000/th. Ecological aspects with social aspects with a sustainability index value in the fairly sustainable category can be categorized as feasible for the development floating cages vannamei shrimp business.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371639
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/371639/files/34516-Article%20Text-199041-1-10-20221209.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbipbid.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.