IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipbjia/371626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analisis Efisiensi Pemasaran Kopi Robusta

Author

Listed:
  • Simorangkir, Nadya Carolina
  • Rosiana, Nia

Abstract

Robusta coffee is a leading commodity in West Lampung Regency. The existence of a gap in coffee prices at the producer and consumer level by 49,04 percent is suspected that a large number of marketing institutions are involved, resulting in high marketing costs. This has led to allegations of unequal pay among marketing institutions. It has an impact on the level of coffee marketing efficiency in the Sekincau District. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the Robusta coffee marketing system that is formed, based on the institutions involved, and analyze the Robusta coffee marketing efficiency in Sekincau District. Research data was obtained from observations, interviews using questionnaires, and supporting data from relevant agencies. The results showed that four marketing channels carried out each marketing function. Based on quantitative calculations, channel I is the most efficient channel with a margin of Rp 5.669 per kg and a farmer’s share of 76,77 percent. Efforts to overcome coffee marketing inefficiencies in Sekincau District, West Lampung Regency through the optimal implementation of marketing functions at each marketing agency, efforts to improve post-harvest quality and sales of coffee products that have been processed into sangria coffee or powder to encourage increased selling prices and farmers' income.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371626
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/371626/files/31996-Article%20Text-178300-2-10-20220622.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbipbid.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.