IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ipbjia/371621.html

Pengaruh Kemitraan Terhadap Efisiensi Dan Risiko Usahatani Bawang Merah Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah

Author

Listed:
  • Yuliastri, Deda Annasia
  • Fariyanti, Anna
  • Tinaprilla, Netti

Abstract

Productivity of shallot in central Java as an area production center has a declining trend from 2013-to 2018. One way to increase productivity is through technical efficiency. However, to increase productivity, the probability of production risk will also be higher. Contract farming is one way to increase productivity and overcome production risks in shallot farming. The objectives of this study were to analyze the effect of contract farming on technical efficiency and perception of risks production between contract and non-contract farmers. Secondary data was used in this study. The research sample consisted of 1.508 (10 contract farmers and 1.498 non-contract farmers) shallot farmers in Central Java. The data were analyzed using the stochastic frontier method to see technical efficiency, and the Likert scale to see farmers' perceptions of production risk. The analysis showed that contract farming affected decreasing efficiency. Meanwhile, there is no difference between both farmers in perceptions of the risk of pest and disease attacks. However, contract farmers’ perception of the risk of climate change was greater in decreasing production than non-contract farmers. Management efforts by both contract and non-contract farmers to overcome pests and plant diseases are no different. They both prefer chemical methods to overcome pest and disease plant attacks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuliastri, Deda Annasia & Fariyanti, Anna & Tinaprilla, Netti, 2022. "Pengaruh Kemitraan Terhadap Efisiensi Dan Risiko Usahatani Bawang Merah Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah," Journal of Indonesian Agribusiness, IPB University, vol. 10(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/371621/files/32514-Article%20Text-177822-1-10-20220617.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ipbjia:371621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbipbid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.