IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inrass/163604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

2003 CAP reform: Impacts of various options on supply in French regions

Author

Listed:
  • Barkhaoui, Ahmed
  • Butault, Jean-Pierre

Abstract

Generally speaking, total aid decoupling, one of the possible options of the 2003 reform, leads to a decline in arable crops and an extensification in beef production; this extensification avoids rural decline. However, developments differ according to regions. Arable crops remain more stable in the already specialised regions and instead drop in the least favoured areas, particularly in mountains. Total decoupling is mainly unfavourable to suckler livestock in French central regions where there are at the same time extensification (when livestock is already extensive) and livestock reduction. BSP partial decoupling is not sufficient to reverse these trends, conversely to Suckler Cow Premium (SCP) recoupling. In more intensive regions, for example in the West, adaptation possibilities appear to be bigger, even in the case of total decoupling: beef cattle do not decline with the extensification which is conducted to the detriment of arable crops. So partial recoupling may lead to an increase in beef cattle. If the objective of the public authority is to maintain equilibrium in beef cattle distribution, keeping the coupled premium for suckler-cows may be justified.

Suggested Citation

  • Barkhaoui, Ahmed & Butault, Jean-Pierre, 2004. "2003 CAP reform: Impacts of various options on supply in French regions," INRAE Sciences Sociales, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2), vol. 2003, pages 1-6, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:inrass:163604
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.163604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/163604/files/iss03-4-5-5_eng.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.163604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inrass:163604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.