IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inrass/160502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obesity, corpulence and social status: a French/American comparison (1970-2000)

Author

Listed:
  • Régnier, Faustine

Abstract

For 30 years, corpulence (frame 1) has developed differently in France to the States. Even if, these past years, the phenomenon has seen quicker growth in France, obesity can be compared neither by its extent nor by age or gender. On either side of the Atlantic, obesity is linked to social status, particularly women, and though it extended in every social milieu between 1970 and 2000, no real weakening of the part played by social factors in obesity is noticeable. The survey on attitudes to weight, varying according to social categories, shows that the most affected individuals belong to social groups where average corpulence is higher and where attention to weight is lower. Should there not be a preventative public health policy focusing on all middle to lower classes?

Suggested Citation

  • Régnier, Faustine, 2005. "Obesity, corpulence and social status: a French/American comparison (1970-2000)," INRAE Sciences Sociales, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2), vol. 2005, pages 1-6, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:inrass:160502
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.160502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/160502/files/iss05-1_eng.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.160502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inrass:160502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.