IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inrass/134676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mettre les choix scientifiques et techniques en débat : l'expérience d'"évaluation technologique interactive" des recherches sur les OGM-vigne à l'INRA

Author

Listed:
  • Joly, Pierre-Benoit
  • Marris, Claire
  • Bertrand, Anne

Abstract

En tant que sources d’innovations, les recherches de l’INRA ont des implications non seulement économiques, mais aussi sociales, politiques et éthiques. Elles peuvent éventuellement apporter des bénéfices mais comportent aussi des risques. Les controverses sur les innovations ont conduit l’INRA à mettre en œuvre des dispositifs qui permettent d’ouvrir la délibération sur l’orientation des programmes de recherche en associant les acteurs concernés de près ou de loin par les applications de ces recherches. C’est dans ce cadre qu’a été initiée en mai 2001 une expérience pilote d’évaluation technologique interactive sur les recherches sur les OGM-vigne.

Suggested Citation

  • Joly, Pierre-Benoit & Marris, Claire & Bertrand, Anne, 2004. "Mettre les choix scientifiques et techniques en débat : l'expérience d'"évaluation technologique interactive" des recherches sur les OGM-vigne à l'INRA," INRAE Sciences Sociales, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2), vol. 2004, pages 1-4, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:inrass:134676
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.134676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/134676/files/iss04-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.134676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inrass:134676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.