Author
Listed:
- Ramu, M.S.
- Umesh, K.B.
- Pavithra, K.N.
- Gowda, H. Chandan
- Habib, Shilpa A
Abstract
India, an agrarian economy with a population of 1.36 billion, has seen a decline in the contribution of agriculture to its GDP, resulting in farmer distress and a search for alternative income sources. This study explored the economic implications of integrating mango orchards with agro-eco-tourism in the Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka, a major mango-producing region. The research compared the costs and returns of mango cultivation between farmers practicing agro-eco-tourism (FPT) and those not practicing it (FNPT). The study involved 90 respondents, including 15 FPT farmers, 20 FNPT farmers, and 25 market intermediaries. Data were collected through structured interviews and analyzed using cost and return analysis, marketing efficiency, and socio-economic factors. The results revealed that FPT farmers incurred higher costs due to tourism-related activities but achieved significantly higher yields and returns compared to FNPT farmers. FPTs also benefited from better land utilization, higher literacy rates, and a greater proportion of irrigated land. Marketing efficiency was higher for FPTs due to direct consumer engagement, with a notable increase in the producers’ share in the consumer’s rupee. The study concluded that mango agro-eco-tourism offered a viable and profitable strategy for improving farm income and sustainability. The findings suggested that agro-eco-tourism could play a crucial role in enhancing the livelihoods of mango farmers in Karnataka, serving as a model for rural development and poverty alleviation in other regions facing similar agricultural challenges.
Suggested Citation
Ramu, M.S. & Umesh, K.B. & Pavithra, K.N. & Gowda, H. Chandan & Habib, Shilpa A, 2025.
"From Orchard to Market: A Comparative Cost and Return Analysis of Mango in the Realm of Agro-Eco-Tourism,"
Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, Indian Society of Agricultural Marketing, vol. 39(1).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:injagm:400080
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.400080
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:injagm:400080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://agrilmktg.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.