Author
Abstract
The market price for agricultural produce many times tends to be unstable and volatile which may result into undue losses to the growers and discourage adoption of the modern technology and required inputs. Due to delay in procurement, most of the benefit goes to traders under the guise of farmers. Keeping this in view, a study was undertaken with objective to evaluate the performance of the process of procurement of pulses under different procurement agencies through PSS (Price Support Scheme) in Karnataka. The data collected pertained to the year 2017–18 for procurement of redgram and greengram in Kalyan Karnataka region. Primary data were collected from 60 sample farmers and 15 different procurement agencies through personal interview method using pre-tested schedules. The results revealed that the farmers who sold their produce to PSS procurement centres realized higher benefits than selling it in open market. Thus the operation of procurement centres during the period of fall in the market price below MSP level was justified. It was also observed that PSS procurement had price advantage to both redgram farmers and greengram farmers when compared to open market sales. The study concluded that procurement through FPOs was more efficient compared to PACS due to availability and accessibility of infrastructures, manpower and efficient management. The suggested policy options are i) need of financial support for creating and upgrading the infrastructure facility for storage of pulses at grass root level, ii) need for expansion of FPOs in fast track mode with financial and technical support for improvement in procurement of food grains at MSP and iii) fixing the limit of procurement from each farmer based on the area and yield obtained from crop survey report rather than limiting the quantity arbitrarily.
Suggested Citation
Joshi, Amrutha T., 2022.
"Performance analysis of price support scheme for pulses in Karnataka,"
Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, Indian Society of Agricultural Marketing, vol. 36(2).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:injagm:399821
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.399821
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:injagm:399821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://agrilmktg.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.