Author
Listed:
- Rani, S. Padma
- Vidhyavathi, A.
- Hemalatha, S.
Abstract
National Agriculture Market (NAM) is an electronic trading portal that connects the existing APMC markets to create a unified national market for agricultural commodities. In Tamil Nadu, about 282 regulated markets are functioning under 23 market committees. Of these Sixty three regulated markets have been brought under the e NAM system in two phases during 2017–2020. The present study was conducted in Anaimalai and Gobichettipalayam, Regulated Markets. The major objectives of the study are i) to assess the level of awareness about e-NAM among farmers and traders ii)to study the willingness to participate in eNAM trading by farmers and traders iii) to study the benefits and constraints perceived by farmers, traders, and market offcials in adoption of e-NAM. Primary data was collected from 60 farmers and 60 traders in Gobichettipalayam & Anaimalai regulated markets. Binary Logit regression model was used to know the willingness to participate in e Nam marketing by farmers and traders. Analysis of results shows that the about 30% registered farmers are unaware of e-NAM. The major factor influencing the participation of farmers in eNAM is remunerative price, income and IT knowledge which have a positive influence on willingness to participate in eNam trading. Whereas, distance from farm to market had a negative influence on willingness to accept eNam. The major factors influencing the traders’ participation is the level of IT knowledge. Inadequate infrastructural facilities and delayed payment (95%) are the major constraints faced by farmers in the study markets. lack of awareness and computer skills knowledge among farmers made them diffcult in understanding e-NAM process.
Suggested Citation
Rani, S. Padma & Vidhyavathi, A. & Hemalatha, S., 2022.
"A study on benefits of E- Nam markets perceived by farmers and traders: A case in anaimalai and gopichettipalayam markets in Tamil Nadu,"
Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, Indian Society of Agricultural Marketing, vol. 36(1).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:injagm:399806
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.399806
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:injagm:399806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://agrilmktg.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.