Author
Listed:
- Muragod, Harsha M.
- Kiresur, V.R.
- Mundinamani, S.M.
Abstract
Farmers’ income remained low in relation to income of those working in the non-farm sector. The non-agriculture worker earns three times more than agriculture worker. Low level of absolute income as well as large and deteriorating disparity between income of farmer and non-agriculture worker is important reason for agrarian distress in the country. Hence to tackle the distress and reduce the gap between agriculture worker and non-agriculture worker, the announcement of doubling farmers’ income was made. Farmers and agriculture labours formed 56 per cent of workforce of Karnataka state. Karnataka state endowed with plenty of natural resources, has high potential to double the income of the farmers. According to a survey conducted by NSSO in 2013, the average annual income of the farmers in Karnataka was about Rs. 1, 06, 254 which was only Rs.31, 392 in 2003. Major source of income was cultivation followed by wages/salaries, non-farm wages and livestock. Share of livestock and non-farm business increased from 2002–03 to 2012–13. The primary data collected in 2017–18 revealed that Coastal Zone had highest (Rs 8, 95, 956) annual income and had less diversified source of income. The average annual income of sample respondents was Rs. 3, 95, 224. Marketing of farm output was major area which needed the attention to double the farmers’ income. Diversifying the sources of income help the farmer to tackle the risk. The government should support the farmer through proper marketing facilities, subsidies, custom hiring centers etc. Farmers should concentrate on, reducing their input cost, diversifying their sources of income by doing allied agricultural activities and non-farm business activities.
Suggested Citation
Muragod, Harsha M. & Kiresur, V.R. & Mundinamani, S.M., 2018.
"Diversification of income sources-A way towards management of risk in agriculture,"
Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, Indian Society of Agricultural Marketing, vol. 32(3).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:injagm:399599
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.399599
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:injagm:399599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://agrilmktg.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.