IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijssme/414534.html

Artificial Intelligence Adoption And Employee Productivity In Public Institutions And Higher Education Organisations In Nigeria: The Mediating Role Of Organisational Readiness

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Munirat Nma
  • Adebayo Helen Oluwatoyin
  • Obichie Elvis Ugo
  • Ahmed Hassan Ahmed
  • Chida Ezekiel

Abstract

This study examined the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption on employee productivity in public institutions and higher education organisations in Nigeria, disaggregating AI adoption into AI-assisted decision making, AI-based automation, and generative AI utilisation, and testing organisational readiness—comprising management support, digital infrastructure, employee AI knowledge and skills, and institutional policy—as a mediating mechanism linking adoption to productivity outcomes. A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was employed, targeting lecturers, academic administrators, registry staff, ICT personnel, departmental administrators, and management staff drawn from federal and state universities, polytechnics, colleges of education, and government agencies. Data were collected using a structured, validated five-point Likert-scale questionnaire adapted from established scales, and analysed using hierarchical multiple regression together with bootstrapped mediation analysis (Hayes' PROCESS macro, Model 4) at the 0.05 significance level, preceded by reliability, multicollinearity, and normality diagnostics. Findings revealed that AI-assisted decision making (β = 0.472, p < 0.001), AI-based automation (β = 0.357, p < 0.001), and generative AI utilisation (β = 0.167, p < 0.001) each exerted a positive and significant effect on employee productivity. Furthermore, organisational readiness significantly mediated the relationships between AI-based automation and employee productivity (indirect effect = 0.261, 95% CI: 0.189–0.331) and between generative AI utilisation and employee productivity (indirect effect = 0.221, 95% CI: 0.099–0.362). However, organisational readiness did not significantly mediate the relationship between AI-assisted decision making and employee productivity (indirect effect = -0.038, 95% CI: -0.121–0.041). The study extends the limited Nigeria-centric evidence base on AI adoption within public-sector and higher-education settings and informs institutional policy on infrastructure investment, staff training, and governance frameworks required to convert AI adoption into measurable productivity gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Munirat Nma & Adebayo Helen Oluwatoyin & Obichie Elvis Ugo & Ahmed Hassan Ahmed & Chida Ezekiel, 2026. "Artificial Intelligence Adoption And Employee Productivity In Public Institutions And Higher Education Organisations In Nigeria: The Mediating Role Of Organisational Readiness," International Journal of Social Science, Management and Economics Research - IJSSMER, International Journal of Social Science, Management and Economics Research - IJSSMER, vol. 4(5), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijssme:414534
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.414534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/414534/files/ARTIFICIAL%2BINTELLIGENCE%2BADOPTION%2BAND%2BEMPLOYEE%2BPRODUCTIVITY%2BIN%2BPUBLIC%2BINSTITUTIONS%2BAND%2BHIGHER%2BEDUCATION%2BORGANISATIONS%2BIN%2BNIGERIA_%2BTHE%2BMEDIATING%2BROLE%2BOF%2BORGANISATIONAL%2BREADINESS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.414534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijssme:414534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijssmer.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.