Author
Listed:
- Yap, Cheng Boon
- Katterbauer, Klemens
- Cleenewerck de kiev, Laurent
Abstract
Urbanization is a prevailing trend globally. More than 50% of the world’s population currently live in cities and the proportion is likely to grow to 70% by 2050 (World Bank Group, 2023). Amid this urbanization wave, smart cities have seen a noticeable rise since the 2010s (Almihat et al., 2022). Two other trends are picking up pace alongside the growth of smart cities. Firstly, there is greater focus on sustainable development since all United Nations (UN) member states adopted the seventeen global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015. Secondly, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) transforms how people go about their daily lives and how cities function, including in pursuing the SDGs. Against this backdrop, there is value to study how AI could augment sustainability outcomes in smart cities. Specifically, this paper hypothesizes there are differences in how smart cities across regions apply AI to pursue sustainable development and seeks to uncover potential factors influencing such differences. The main methodology in this research is a set of comparative case studies involving three regions that have made notable progress in smart cities development – China, Singapore, and the United States. The findings from the comparative case studies validate the hypothesis that there are perceptible differences in how smart cities across regions deploy AI to pursue the SGDs. A potential factor for such differences could be regional sociocultural influences – an aspect that urban planners and policymakers should pay more attention to when applying AI in smart cities to improve sustainable development outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Yap, Cheng Boon & Katterbauer, Klemens & Cleenewerck de kiev, Laurent, .
"Comparative case studies on the different approaches in applying artificial intelligence in smart cities for sustainable development,"
International Journal of Social Science, Management and Economics Research - IJSSMER, International Journal of Social Science, Management and Economics Research - IJSSMER, vol. 2(6).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ijssme:355402
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355402
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijssme:355402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijssmer.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.