Author
Listed:
- Asma Batool
- Khalid Abdullah
- Aqdus Zahra
- Iqtidar Hussain
- Syed Safeer Abbas
- Shumaila Kiran
- Sadaf Javeria
- Syeda Rabail Zahra
- Muhammad Naeem
Abstract
Fruit flies are among the most destructive insect pests affecting horticultural crops globally. They cause significant losses in fruit and vegetable production by reducing both quality and yield. In a series of laboratory experiments conducted in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan, the infectivity of six entomopathogenic nematode (EPN) species—Steinernema carpocapsae, S. feltiae, S. kraussei, S. glaseri, Heterorhabditis indica, and H. bacteriophora—was evaluated against the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Following exposure, the larvae were dissected to detect the presence of nematodes. Among the tested species, H. bacteriophora and S. feltiae demonstrated the highest infection rates, with 97.6% and 85.1% respectively, indicating their strong potential as biological control agents. In contrast, S. glaseri was found to be the least effective against D. melanogaster. Based on adult fly emergence data, H. bacteriophora and S. feltiae were identified as the most virulent EPNs. The study also suggested that measuring adult fly emergence is a more reliable method for assessing EPN efficacy than larval dissection. Infections in the pupal stage were comparatively lower, with S. feltiae and H. indica causing 60% and 58% infection rates, respectively. These findings suggest that D. melanogaster is susceptible to infection by H. bacteriophora and S. feltiae, highlighting their potential role as key components in integrated pest management (IPM) strategies for controlling fruit fly populations.
Suggested Citation
Asma Batool & Khalid Abdullah & Aqdus Zahra & Iqtidar Hussain & Syed Safeer Abbas & Shumaila Kiran & Sadaf Javeria & Syeda Rabail Zahra & Muhammad Naeem, 2026.
"Screening Entomopathogenic Nematodes For Their Potential Against Drosophila Melanogaster,"
International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 12(1), January.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ijaeri:396354
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.396354
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:396354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.