IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/376238.html

Comparative Assessment Of Local Tomato Varieties Under Organic And Conventional Cultivation

Author

Listed:
  • Aglaia Liopa-Tsakalidi
  • Kleopatra Giannopoulou

Abstract

This study comparatively assessed the performance of three local Greek tomato varieties—'Chios', 'Milo', and 'Grentza'—under organic and conventional cultivation systems. The research evaluated phytometric (plant growth), reproductive (flowering and fruiting), and qualitative (fruit characteristics) parameters to determine varietal adaptability and system efficiency. Organic cultivation significantly enhanced vegetative growth, with 'Chios' and 'Milo' exhibiting 85% and 166% increases in fresh plant weight, respectively, compared to conventional farming. Reproductive performance varied: 'Chios' produced 159% more fruits under organic management, whereas 'Grentza' showed higher fruit quality (↑ °Brix) but reduced yield (-77%). Fruit quality traits, including soluble solids and average fruit weight, were generally superior in organic systems, suggesting improved nutritional and organoleptic properties. The findings highlight genotype-dependent responses, with 'Chios' and 'Milo' demonstrating strong suitability for organic production, while 'Grentza' may require tailored management. This study underscores the potential of local varieties in sustainable agriculture, balancing yield and quality while conserving agrobiodiversity

Suggested Citation

  • Aglaia Liopa-Tsakalidi & Kleopatra Giannopoulou, 2025. "Comparative Assessment Of Local Tomato Varieties Under Organic And Conventional Cultivation," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 11(05), October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:376238
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.376238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/376238/files/ijaer_11__102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.376238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:376238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.