IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/371463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment Of Charged Biochar And Selected Organic Fertilisers Effects On Soil Properties, Nutritional Quality, And Profitability Of Lettuce

Author

Listed:
  • Saidy, O.
  • Isutsa, D. K.
  • Karanja, B. K.

Abstract

Excessive use of synthetic fertilisers poses soil degradation challenges that partly constrain sustainable vegetable production in many tropical regions. This research aimed at assessing the agronomic and economic potential of organic fertilisers in enhancing lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) soil properties, nutritional quality, and profitability. Specifically, it determined effects of selected organic fertilisers on soil properties, vitamin C, mineral nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg), and net economic benefit (NEB) of lettuce. It was done in a randomized complete block design with six treatments (negative control-soil, positive control-NPK+Urea, charged biochar, compost, poultry and farmyard manures) replicated three times in two seasons from October 2024 to May 2025 onfarm at Egerton University, Kenya. Iceberg lettuce variety used was grown in a nursery bed for five weeks followed by transplanting to permanent experimental plots, measuring 2m x 1.5m and accommodating 30 lettuce plants at 30cm x 30cm spacing. Data was collected pre- and postproduction on soil and organic fertilisers, as well as in the 9th week on lettuce fresh weight, nutritional quality components, and net economic benefit. Data was subjected to analysis of variance using JMP Pro 17th edition program. Numerically, application of organic fertilisers resulted in decreased N, P, pH, OC, OM, but increased K, Ca, Mg, CEC, and C:N in soil after lettuce growth. Nonetheless, all treatments had a pH of 6.1 - 6.5, which was optimal for lettuce growth and development. In seasons 1 and 2, lettuce leaf tissue analysis showed significant (P= 0.001; P= 0.048) differences in vitamin C, ranging from 2.0 – 3.2 and 1.0 – 1.4 meg/100 mg. However, there were no significant (P> 0.05) differences in nutritional minerals N, P, K, Mg and Ca. The NEB varied significantly (P= 0.001; 0.011), with poultry manure giving the highest NEB of 543 – 833/=, while biochar (217/=) and compost (224/=) giving the lowest. This study revealed that organic fertilisers influence soil properties, lettuce quality and profitability differently. The organic fertilisers significantly enhanced vitamin C and NEB more than no fertilisers. Adoption of poultry manure would serve as a profitable alternative to synthetic fertilisers, while optimizing quality and soil properties. It recommends further research on long-term effects of biochar on soil properties, lettuce quality and profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Saidy, O. & Isutsa, D. K. & Karanja, B. K., . "Assessment Of Charged Biochar And Selected Organic Fertilisers Effects On Soil Properties, Nutritional Quality, And Profitability Of Lettuce," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 11(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:371463
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.371463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/371463/files/ijaer_11__68.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.371463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:371463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.