IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/362686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Differentials In Livestock Financing: A Comparative Study Of Formal And Informal Credit Markets In Imo State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • U.M. Olumba
  • F.O. Nwosu
  • C. Chikezie
  • K.H. Anyiam

Abstract

This study investigated the risk differentials in livestock financing between formal and informal credit markets in Imo State, Nigeria. A total of 120 livestock farmers were sampled, and data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings revealed that access to financial institutions revealed a significant gender disparity, with males dominating both formal (55.0%) and informal (56.7%) financial institutions. Most livestock farmers financed by formal financial institutions (46.7%) had a mean of 7 years of experience in livestock production, whereas those financed by informal financial institutions (55%) had a mean of 8 years of experience. Most livestock farmers financed by formal financial institutions (46.7%) and those financed by informal financial institutions (58.3%) had secondary education. Formal credit sources provided significantly higher loan amounts (₦1,515,833), charged higher interest rates (7.03%), and offered longer repayment periods (18 months) compared to informal sources, which provided an average of ₦244,167, with lower interest rates (0.73%) and shorter durations (7 months). Formal credit also exhibited higher financial risk, evidenced by greater variance (₦92.83 billion) and standard deviation (₦304,681.07) in earnings, relative to informal credit (variance: ₦16.58 billion; SD: ₦128,743.93). The major factors militating against accessing formal credit included savings deposit requirements (95.0%), insufficient collateral (85.0%), lack of guarantors (83.3%), and years of account holding (75.0%). In contrast, informal credit access was limited primarily by insufficient loan amounts (90.0%), years of group membership (80.0%), and collateral (76.7%). These results underscore the trade-off between loan size and financial risk in credit market choice. To enhance livestock financing, policymakers should promote reforms that reduce entry barriers to formal credit, regulate interest rates, and strengthen risk management frameworks within formal financial institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • U.M. Olumba & F.O. Nwosu & C. Chikezie & K.H. Anyiam, 2025. "Risk Differentials In Livestock Financing: A Comparative Study Of Formal And Informal Credit Markets In Imo State, Nigeria," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 11(03), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:362686
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.362686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362686/files/ijaer_11__54.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.362686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:362686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.