IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/iepeoa/158259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Benefit Analysis Of Establishment Of Scots Pine, Austrian Pine And Spruce Forest Plantations

Author

Listed:
  • Ratknić, Mihailo
  • Braunović, Sonja

Abstract

The cost-benefit analysis, which contributes to finding best solutions and helps in making decision on acceptability of treatment, has been used as an instrument in the assessment of afforestation impact on the environment. It has been established that a cost-effective investment into Scots pine, Austrian pine and Spruce afforestation is viable solely on the basis of wood production. Wood production, depending on tree species and soil quality, can bear even slightly higher interest rates in the areas of good soil quality in comparison to previous estimates, which mostly ranged around 3%. In the areas of poor soil quality, the interest rates can drop even below the 3% rate. At lower discount rates, the breakeven point is extended in time, whereas at higher discount rates, it is shortened. The length of production cycle performs an important role in determining the costeffectiveness of an investment, particularly from the aspect of the relation between the length of production cycle and production purposes (type and quality of wood assortments that are produced). Based on the analysis of non-quantifiable benefits and costs, it has been established that the benefits surpass the costs, therefore, afforestation projects can be acceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratknić, Mihailo & Braunović, Sonja, 2013. "Cost-Benefit Analysis Of Establishment Of Scots Pine, Austrian Pine And Spruce Forest Plantations," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:158259
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.158259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/158259/files/13%20-%20Ratknic_%20Braunovic.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.158259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:158259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iepbgyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.