IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hukruc/206847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Agricultural Policy 2007 – 2013 Vs. 2014 -2020

Author

Listed:
  • Rašovská, Adriana

Abstract

Slovakia is perceived as a leader among the European countries due to its size of farms. Despite of a high concentration of farms - up to 95.1% of the utilized agricultural land are farmed by large farms - the Slovak agriculture is considerably less productive. The reform of Common Agriculture Policy tries to develop not only the traditional role of agriculture, a food production, but shapes the face of country, affects the quality of environment and also helps to increase the potential of tourism development through the cooperation of direct payments system, capping and greening. To make a right decision in allocation of this support, it is necessary to become familiar with its advantages and disadvantages especially in Slovak agricultural conditions: Direct payments system – the use of objective criteria would ensure a more equitable and efficient use of budgetary resources in comparison to e.g. EU flat rate, where Slovakia is paid with lower direct payments than the other Member States. Objective criteria reflect the dual role of direct payments in providing income support and public goods. Capping - The primary objective of capping is to increase the downward nature of employment in animal production, or at least to maintain its current state in Member States like Slovakia, Czech Republic or Germany, where the biggest farms are located due to the historical development. In previous years, the animal production has been forgotten regarding to higher payments paid to the crop production. This unbalance could be changed by reform of Common Agriculture Policy. Greening – opponents of green rules, which should ensure the maintaining of the permanent pastures; diversification and maintaining the "ecological landscape” highlight their possible negative impacts like reduction in the competitiveness of Slovak agricultural products; decrease of potential output growth; increased costs in crop production; etc. But one of its indisputable advantage hides in the opportunity to spread the crop of soybeans and pulses that could be a rewarding alternative of possible farms losses in these increasingly hotter summers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rašovská, Adriana, 2014. "Common Agricultural Policy 2007 – 2013 Vs. 2014 -2020," Acta Carolus Robertus, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hukruc:206847
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.206847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/206847/files/Rasovska.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.206847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hukruc:206847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrghu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.