IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hukrgr/188134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Észak-Magyarország Xxi. Századi Városodásának Társadalmi-Gazdasági Aspektusai

Author

Listed:
  • Bujdosó, Zoltán

Abstract

Az Észak-magyarországi Régió 2013-ban 40 várossal rendelkezik, ezzel hazánkban a második legvárosodottabb régiója. Hazánk városállományából a régió 12%-al részesedik, ugyanakkor elmondható, hogy sem területileg, sem funkcionálisan nem tekinthető homogénnek a vizsgált terület urbanizációja. Az új városok megyénkénti területi megoszlását tekintve elmondható, hogy az Észak-magyarországi Régió városodása – elsősorban Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megyének köszönhetően – az elmúlt évtizedben országos viszonylatban jelentős volt, de nagy számú számú várost avattak még az ország keleti, északkeleti részében, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hajdú-Bihar és Békés megyében. Az Észak-Magyarországi Régiót területileg vizsgálva elmondható, hogy néhány térség (Sajó-völgy, Miskolc környéke, Borsodi-Mezőség) erősen városodott, míg elsősorban a határmenti térségben nagy kiterjedésű városhiányos területek találhatók. Ugyanez jellemző a Cserhát és a Cserehát térségére. A régiók elsősorban rurális területein a XXI. században nagymértékű városodás indult el, e folyamat sajátosságait mutatja be a tanulmány. ---------------------------------------------------------------- The texture of the town system in Hungary was really sparse after the World War II. when there were only 52 legal town. This number has increased more than fivefold in the last 65 years and after the most recent grading there are 318 settlements with this title. The towns in 19 counties most of them situated in Pest County (47), followed by Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén (27) and Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg (26) followed by Bács-Kiskun, Békés and Hajdú-Bihar. So on the Great Plain, mostly the populated settlements with large area reclassified nowadays. The least number of towns is in Nógrád, Csongrád and Heves County, but to tell the truth these three counties have relatively small areas.If we take into consideration the number of settlement in the county Hajdú-Bihar is the top-ranking followed by Békés, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok, and the counties of denser, village like system of settlements are the last: Zala, Baranya, Vas and Nógrád.The towns with the highest number of inhabitants expect Budapest in Hungary in 2013 Debrecen (218.000), Miskolc and Szeged (roughly 180.000) the towns with the smallest number of inhabitants is Pálháza (1200), Visegrád and Zalakaros (just above 1500). In the aspect of number of urban inhabitants the rate is highest in Hajdú-Bihar and Csongrád and Békés almost reach this level, but Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Somogy, Nógrád and Heves Counties stay beyond 50%. According to the above mentioned researches made by Beluszky Pál Pest County has undergone the greatest change of number of population in the last decade followed by Békés and Hajdú-Bihar while the smallest values of course belong to Nógrád, Heves and Komárom-Esztergom Counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Bujdosó, Zoltán, 2014. "Észak-Magyarország Xxi. Századi Városodásának Társadalmi-Gazdasági Aspektusai," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:188134
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.188134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/188134/files/3%20Bujdos_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.188134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:188134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrghu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.