IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hilgar/381707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commodity tolerance studies of deciduous fruits to moist heat and fumigants

Author

Listed:
  • Claypool, L. L.
  • Vines, H. M.

Abstract

Studies were made of commodity tolerance of deciduous fruits to various treatments designed as possible conditions for the movement of fruits across quarantine barriers set up for the Oriental and other fruit flies. Of the many chemicals tested the two showing greatest promise were ethylene dibromide and ethylene chlorobromide. The margin of safety between dosages of these two chemicals reported to give complete kill of all stages of certain fruit flies and dosages that damaged the fruit was much greater than with methyl bromide—a widely used fumigant. Bromine residues remaining in treated fruits were small and these dissipated rapidly; they were thought to be of little concern to public health. Should an insect pest such as the Oriental fruit fly become established in California and create a quarantine problem, the successful use of commodity treatments for interstate movement of deciduous tree fruits seems very promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Claypool, L. L. & Vines, H. M., 1956. "Commodity tolerance studies of deciduous fruits to moist heat and fumigants," Hilgardia, California Agricultural Experiment Station, vol. 24(12).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hilgar:381707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/381707/files/v24n12p297.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hilgar:381707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.