IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hilgar/381649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intraspecific variability in response to pesticides in the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

Author

Listed:
  • Hoy, Marjorie A.
  • Grafton-Cardwell, Elizabeth E.

Abstract

Adult common green lacewings, Chrysoperla cornea (Stephens) (formerly known as Chrysopa carnea), were collected from alfalfa fields, each separated by approximately 200 to 500 km, in four California counties. Adults, as well as larvae and eggs reared from those adults, were screened with six pesticides: two carbamates (carbaryl and methomyl), two pyrethroids (permethrin and fenvalerate), and two organophosphorus insecticides (diazinon and phosmet), to detect intraspecific variability in their responses to pesticides. Methods for screening adults, larvae, and eggs were developed. Adults and larvae were highly tolerant of field rates of the pyrethroids. Larvae also tolerated phosmet, probably due to hydrolysis by esterase enzymes. Lacewings from the four locations responded significantly differently to all six pesticides. In general, San Joaquin County lacewings exhibited the highest and Imperial County lacewings the lowest mortality, with Kern and Fresno County lacewings variable in their responses. These results correspond with pesticide usage in California. Egg hatch was not affected by any of the pesticides tested. Reciprocal crosses of San Joaquin and Imperial County adults were successful, indicating that reproductive isolation does not exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoy, Marjorie A. & Grafton-Cardwell, Elizabeth E., 1985. "Intraspecific variability in response to pesticides in the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)," Hilgardia, California Agricultural Experiment Station, vol. 53(6).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hilgar:381649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/381649/files/v53n06p032.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hilgar:381649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.